Logo
Forensic AI Image Suite
C2PA & ELA Certified

AI Image Detector: Check If an Image Is AI-Generated

Upload an image to check for AI generation, manipulation and authenticity signals. AIDetector.cx analyzes visual patterns, metadata and available provenance without treating one signal as absolute proof.

Dual-Mode Analysis
Explainable Findings
C2PA & Provenance
Compression-Aware
Inpainting Screening
REST API Ready
You’ve used your free guest check. Create an account to get 4 additional free checks.
Guest
Instant single check. Create a free account anytime to unlock 4 additional free checks.
Trial Checks Remaining0 of 1 check remaining
1 check usedOne-time introductory checks (lifetime)
You’ve used your free guest check. Create an account to get 4 additional free checks.
Current Feature:Image Detection (Standard)
2 credits
AI Image Forensics & Authenticity Scanner
Analyze JPEG, PNG, WEBP, TIFF, AVIF, and HEIC files up to 25MB with zero data retention.
Or inspect via URL:
Forensic Interpretation

What Your Image Analysis Result Means

AIDetector.cx evaluates probabilistic signals rather than making rigid binary guesses. Every score is calibrated to prevent false accusations while surfacing subtle generative artifacts.

Likely AI-Generated
Synthetic Diffusion Signatures

High convergence across high-frequency Fourier residuals, synthetic pixel noise distributions, and repetitive generative textures (e.g. skin over-smoothing, unnatural pupil geometry).

Confidence Score >75%: Strong statistical evidence of diffusion generation.

Likely Authentic
Natural Optical Sensor Profile

Pixel noise patterns correlate with authentic camera sensor silicon (Bayer filter array, Poisson-Gaussian noise distributions) without generative frequency artifacts.

Confidence Score <25%: Low synthetic probability with natural sensor coherence.

Suspected AI Manipulation
Localized Inpainting & Splicing

The background shows natural optical noise, but specific regions (such as a face, hand, or inserted object) exhibit disparate Error Level Analysis (ELA) divergence and edge boundary warping.

Indicates generative inpainting or composite manipulation.

Technical Architecture

How AIDetector.cx Analyzes an Image

Our multi-signal forensic pipeline fuses pixel-domain, frequency-domain, and cryptographic metadata checks to deliver transparent, explainable results.

1. Visual Artifacts & Textures

Evaluates anatomical coherence (corneal glints, ear symmetry, fingernails), background depth continuity, and fine prompt-rendering artifacts.

2. Error Level Analysis (ELA)

Computes compression differential maps across 8x8 DCT blocks to identify spliced regions saved at differing quantization quality levels.

3. Laplacian Residual Noise

Isolates high-frequency sensor noise from structural image content using spatial Laplacian filters to detect diffusion model grid regularities.

4. C2PA & Provenance Validation

Parses binary JUMBF boxes to verify Adobe Content Credentials, camera hardware signatures, and digital tamper status against root CAs.

Classification Matrix

AI-Generated vs. Edited vs. Authentic Images

Conventional photo adjustments (like Photoshop retouching or color grading) are not generative deepfakes. Here is how our detector distinguishes each category:

Image CategoryPrimary Forensic CharacteristicsDetector VerdictELA Behavior
Fully AI-GeneratedDiffusion residual noise, absent EXIF sensor pipeline, synthetic frequency peaks
Likely AI-Generated
Uniform synthetic compression error map
Generative Inpainting / Face SwapBoundary blending artifacts, localized frequency divergence on facial region
Suspected AI Manipulation
Localized high-divergence error spike
Photoshop / Global RetouchingUniform color grading, unwarped edges, coherent camera noise pattern
Conventional Editing
Low localized divergence without synthetic noise
Authentic Camera CaptureConsistent sensor silicon noise, valid EXIF header, natural lighting vectors
Likely Authentic
Evenly distributed natural error pattern
Heavy Social Re-compressionExtreme quantization noise, downsampled pixel grid (<400px), stripped EXIF
Inconclusive
Severe quantization masking fine residuals
False-Positive Protection

Why AIDetector.cx Protects Against False Positives

Many free tools falsely accuse real photographers because compressed JPEGs look noisy. AIDetector.cx Balanced Mode incorporates compression compensation algorithms and lists real benign conditions:

Compression Compensation

Compensates for WhatsApp, WeChat, and TikTok aggressive JPEG re-compression so quantization artifacts are not mislabeled as AI noise.

Multi-Signal Convergence

Never makes an AI verdict based on a single heuristic. Requires multi-layer consensus between ELA, frequency residuals, and metadata.

Legitimate Filter Recognition

Recognizes digital illustrations, smartphone Night Mode computational photography, and cosmetic smoothing as non-generative.

Simple Workflow

How to Use the Free AI Image Detector Online

Verify any photo in three fast, evidence-based steps.

1

Upload or Paste Image

Drag and drop your file, paste directly from clipboard, or enter an image URL. Supports JPEG, PNG, WEBP, AVIF, HEIC up to 25MB.

2

Choose Detection Mode

Select Balanced Mode for high false-positive resistance or High-Sensitivity to detect minor inpainting traces.

3

Review Verdict & Export

Inspect the calibrated confidence indicator, ELA heatmap, and C2PA signature. Download a PDF certificate or JSON payload.

Model Compatibility

What Image Generators Can Be Analyzed?

The detector evaluates images from known and unknown generation workflows. Performance can vary by model version, post-processing, and compression.

OpenAI DALL-E 3 / ChatGPT
Benchmarked
Midjourney (v5 / v6 / v7)
Benchmarked
FLUX.1 (schnell / dev / pro)
Benchmarked
Stable Diffusion (XL / SD3.5)
Benchmarked
Google Imagen 3 / Gemini
Benchmarked
Adobe Firefly (1 / 2 / 3)
C2PA Validated
Ideogram 2.0
Benchmarked
Leonardo AI / Photoreal
Benchmarked
Canva Magic Media
Benchmarked
Grok 2 / Flux Grok
Benchmarked
Recraft V3
Benchmarked
Custom LoRA & Fine-tunes
Diffusion Screened
Enterprise Risk Screening

AI Image Detection for KYC and Fraud Screening

Designed to support KYC and fraud-screening workflows. Automated image detection provides early-warning risk signals to protect account onboarding, payment security, and insurance claims against synthetic identities.

Synthetic ID & Selfie Detection

Flags generated face avatars (StyleGAN, FLUX portraits) and digitally modified government ID photos during customer onboarding.

Insurance & Receipt Verification

Identifies generative inpainting on vehicle damage claims, property loss photographs, and altered medical receipts.

Audit Trails & Human Escalation

Generates tamper-evident SHA-256 evidence certificates for compliance review. Risk signals guide human compliance officers rather than enforcing unreviewed automated bans.

Developer Integration

AI Image Detection API

Integrate enterprise-grade image authenticity checks directly into your content moderation queue, marketplace upload pipeline, or KYC workflow.

The AIDetector.cx REST API allows you to submit binary images or public URLs and receive structured JSON results including AI probability, Error Level Analysis metrics, C2PA claims, and detected model signatures.

  • Single & batch image submission (POST /v1/images/detect)
  • Zero retention in-memory processing guarantees data confidentiality
  • Standardized API keys, credit billing, and webhook notifications
// Sample JSON Response: POST /v1/images/detect
{
  "status": "success",
  "sha256": "8f3b20...91a2",
  "ai_generation": {
    "verdict": "Likely AI-generated",
    "score": 88,
    "confidence_level": "High",
    "detected_signatures": ["Midjourney v6", "Diffusion Residuals"]
  },
  "manipulation": {
    "detected": false,
    "ela_max_divergence_pct": 2.4
  },
  "c2pa": {
    "has_manifest": false
  }
}
Empirical Accuracy & Benchmarking

How Accurate Are AI Image Detectors?

Detection accuracy is not a single static number. Performance varies dynamically across image resolution, generative model architectures, compression, and post-processing filters.

Detector output must always be interpreted as probabilistic forensic evidence, never as absolute judicial proof of human identity. When an image contains clean optical noise from a known camera sensor, confidence exceeds 95%. When an image has been saved multiple times across social media networks, fine diffusion residuals degrade.

Key Factors Increasing Accuracy:

  • Original camera captures with unstripped EXIF
  • Uncompressed PNG or high-bitrate WebP/JPEG
  • High native resolution (>1024x1024px)
  • Presence of signed C2PA Content Credentials

Key Factors Degrading Signals:

  • Aggressive social re-compression (e.g. WhatsApp)
  • Extreme downsampling (<400px width)
  • Heavy Gaussian blurring or artistic filtering
  • Screen captures / phone photos of screens
Pipeline v2.4 Benchmark
Tested: Sep 2026
Curated 1,200 Sample Dataset
600 authentic camera captures vs 600 diffusion generations (MJ v6, DALL-E 3, FLUX.1, SDXL, Imagen 3).
Balanced Mode Precision94.2%
Balanced Mode Recall91.8%
False-Positive Rate3.1%
High-Sensitivity Mode increases Recall to 97.4% while raising False-Positive Rate to 9.8% for strict screening.
Defensive Robustness

Can AI Image Detectors Be Bypassed?

Adversarial techniques and severe compression can degrade individual detection signals. Here is why multi-signal fusion provides resilient protection without relying on a single failure point:

Evasion Techniques

Adversaries often apply subtle film grain, heavy compression, color grading, or cropping to disrupt frequency-domain Fourier peaks and confuse single-heuristic detectors.

Multi-Layer Fusion

AIDetector.cx combines Error Level Analysis (ELA), Laplacian high-frequency residuals, EXIF integrity, C2PA claims, and lighting vector consistency so no single filter blinds the system.

Safe Uncertainty Handling

When an image is too heavily distorted to evaluate with scientific confidence, our engine returns an honest Inconclusive verdict rather than generating an unreliable guess.

Evaluation Criteria

What Makes a Reliable AI Image Detector?

When evaluating image authenticity tools, enterprise and consumer users should look for objective criteria rather than marketing claims:

1. False-Positive Mitigation & Dual Modes

Conservative default thresholds (Balanced Mode) ensure real photographers and authentic historical archives are not falsely accused.

2. Explainable Visual Forensics

Interactive Error Level Analysis (ELA) and Laplacian noise heatmaps allow users to see exactly which pixel clusters triggered flags.

3. Provenance & C2PA Validation

Direct parsing of Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) JUMBF binary boxes checks digital signatures against trusted root CAs.

4. Inpainting & Splicing Localization

Identifies localized modifications where a real background was merged with a generated subject or swapped face.

5. Strict Zero-Retention Privacy

Guarantees that uploaded files are processed in ephemeral memory without permanent storage or training use.

6. Enterprise REST API & Batch Ingestion

Provides scalable JSON endpoints for automated platform moderation and customer onboarding pipelines.

Industry Applications

Who Uses AIDetector.cx AI Image Detector?

From breaking newsrooms to financial compliance teams, our forensic image suite serves diverse verification workflows:

Journalists & Fact-Checkers

Verify viral social media images, citizen journalism footage, and press releases before publishing breaking stories.

Artists & Photographers

Protect original visual portfolios against unauthorized AI scraping and demonstrate authentic human authorship.

Marketplaces & E-Commerce

Screen fraudulent seller listings, synthetic mockups, and non-existent inventory on peer-to-peer commerce sites.

KYC & Identity Fraud Teams

Identify AI-generated onboarding selfie avatars, manipulated driver license portraits, and synthetic bank documents.

Insurance Claim Adjusters

Inspect submitted vehicle collision photos, property damage estimates, and repair receipts for generative inpainting.

Platform Moderation Teams

Automate platform trust and safety screening using high-throughput REST API webhooks to enforce synthetic media policies.

Data Governance & Security

Privacy and Uploaded Images

We uphold strict data confidentiality and zero-retention principles across all image analysis workflows:

1. Ephemeral In-Memory Analysis
Uploaded image bytes are parsed in volatile RAM during the active request. No copies are saved to permanent disks or cloud storage buckets.
2. Zero Model Training
Customer files are never used to train, fine-tune, or calibrate future artificial intelligence models. Your proprietary media remains your own.
3. Client-Side Cryptographic Hash
Evidence reports record a one-way SHA-256 cryptographic hash so audit certificates can be verified without storing the underlying image.
Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions About AI Image Detection

Detailed, technically accurate answers to common questions about artificial intelligence image detection, Error Level Analysis, and verification.